It’s No Game: Experiments in Conflict and Violence

When is a game not a game? When it's deadly serious.
 
Todd Sechser, P.I., and Abigail Post, Project and Lab Manager, presented preliminary findings from their laboratory experiments in conflict and violence to an audience including John Luginsland, a technical adviser in the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR), and Rana Ganguly, Director of Sponsored Research and Development from UVA's College of Arts and Sciences. Sechser's research tests assumptions about how being exposed to violence can shape our behaviors and actions.
 
Todd Sechser presentingThe experiments Sechser presented are designed to tease out what happens to a person after exposure to violent media: do they become more aggressive? Or more empathetic? The academic literature offers conflicting answers. Studies in psychology have shown that video game violence seems to cause more aggressive behavior in experimental subjects, but other research has found that exposure to actual violence seems to decrease it. Sechser’s experiments, which involved more than 500 subjects, will help reconcile this disagreement. Initial papers from his project are forthcoming in the Journal of Conflict Resolution and International Studies Quarterly. Ultimately he hopes to field-test these experiments in countries that have experienced large-scale violence.
 
To run his experiments, Sechser built an experimental laboratory from scratch, which he launched in the spring of 2016. Twelve laptops, headphones, portable partitions, and heavy-duty wire carts make the lab mobile, giving him the ability to conduct experiments anywhere. The lab manager, Abigail Post, can set up the machines and software in a matter of minutes. Overall, Sechser’s laboratory team consists of 10 graduate students and more than 20 undergraduates.
 
Sechser's program is the outcome of a seed grant from the Quantitative Collaborative, an initiative out of the Dean's office. QC Seed Grants are designed to provide researchers with the initial funding to gather the elements for larger grant applications. Sechser’s seed grant helped him lay the groundwork for a large-scale grant from the Air Force to launch his experimental lab and conduct  experiments. Seed grants are supposed to work like this and the Dean's office has high hopes for their investments. The QC has continued to provide support for the lab by helping to purchase additional materials and equipment to keep it running.
 
Sechser and Post plan to continue their experiments to help answer other important questions about conflict and violence.  How does violence shape group identities and behavior? What is the role of emerging technologies in civil wars and insurgencies? In the long term, Sechser hopes to make the laboratory a permanent fixture in the Politics Department, with dedicated space and staff to help answer these questions.

A Full Plate, the Politics of Food at Morven Summer Institute

Have you been confused about summer? Have you asked "what is it for?”, “how much does it cost?” , “does it make my GPA look big?"
 
Get ready to be unconfused. What if you spent your summer tucked into the rolling green hills of Virginia learning how everything, SIMPLY EVERYTHING, is related to food? As you push your peas around on your plate, it all begins to make sense: food is politics and politics is power.
 
Paul Freedman and Leslie Hubbard after mindfulness exercise
Paul Freedman and Leslie Hubbard with Politics of Food participants after mindfulness exercise
You’re taking Paul Freedman's Politics of Food—that’s why it makes sense. The dense network of food, its producers, consumers, distributors, regulators, farmers, workers, marketers, restauranteurs, are everything to him. During the class he examines controversies over agriculture subsidies, labeling requirements, taxation, farming practices, food safety, advertising and education. Each of these things leads to an examination of American democracy—representation, regulation, legislation, and public opinion. Ultimately the class examines the ways in which the politics of food represents both a reflection and a distortion of fundamental democratic principles.
 
For support he draws from Wendell Berry, Michael Pollan, Marion Nestle, all the big minds/big mouths in food. During this session he brings to the table D.C. food lobbyist Stuart Pape and mindfulness instructor Leslie Hubbard, from the Contemplative Sciences Center who teaches mindful eating, Joel Salatin of Polyface Farm, Martha Stafford of the Charlottesville Cooking School, Anna Maria Siega-Riz who helps the USDA develop Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Christianne Queiroz—Legal Aid Society and Program Director at the Virginia Farm Workers, and Seth Wispelwey, director of The Arbor, Charlottesville.
 
Freedman teaches Politics of Food during J-Term and Summer Session. This Summer Session, it’s a full-course 5½ hours a day for 10 days. The current session’s location is especially interesting—held on Morven Farm's 2,913 acres, which includes formal gardens, a Japanese tea garden,  horse barns, historic homes, a meeting barn complete with a movie theater, and a one-acre kitchen garden down the road from Monticello. Partial scholarships are available.
 
Remember: 99% of our time is spent thinking about food. Only the other 1% is attention focused on Donald Trump.
 

Carol Mershon’s Global Service for ♀ in Academia

Carol Mershon at Women in Academia GroupCarol Mershon will be be presenting her work Advancing Women’s Research in Higher Education at an “all school” lecture at  University of Venda in South Africa on June 15th, 2016. As part of the four day retreat, she will co-lead discussions on publication and research strategies to equalize women’s research in academia. This event immediately follows her adventures in Finland, 9,000 miles (14,000 km) away.
 
Mershon twice previously spoke at Venda and views her visit as part of her professional commitment to service. The University of Virginia encourages service as an integral part of a professor’s work; at UVA Mershon is the Director of Diversity and Inclusion in the Department of Politics, incorporates service into the UVA CHARGE initiative—an NSF ADVANCE program, consulting for Journal of Politics Task Force on Gender, as a presenter at Women in Academia, and with Denise Walsh as co-Primary Investigator of the NSF-funded Gendering Political Science, among others. 
 
She says her program in South Africa is designed to "turn political science in on itself.” To illustrate her method she interlocks her ten fingers and reverses her hands in a gesture to reveal wiggling fingers, a gesture familiar as “Here’s the church, here’s the steeple, open the doors and there’s the people.” Using the tools and data methods available to political scientists, she will engage participants to reform limits and predjudice in the discipline by using good data and clear methods. 
 
She indicates her strategy blurs the line between service and research. She is using it to reform curricula, is teaching it to her Graduate Research Assistants, and of course will be sharing it at the University of Venda.

Money, Money, Money! Finnish Conference Cashing-In on the Work of Mershon, Gordon,  and Simons

Mershon, Gordon, SimonsWhy do songs about money always repeat money, money, money? But I digress.
 
Carol Mershon, Geoff Gordon, Jennifer Simons will be presenting at the Institutions in Context workshop at the University of Tampere in Tampere, Finland. The theme of the conference is The Role of Money in Politics and that is on everyone’s minds in this election year. Apparently money is always on the minds of politicians—it’s all about the Benjamins, the baht, the peso, the lira,  the euro, and soon the Tubmans. :)
 
For her first time in Finland, Carol Mershon will present Chiefs in South Africa: What Role in Upholding or Undermining Inequalities? The research, part of a larger work, (a DPU—discrete publishable unit), is being presented to garner feedback from the conference participants whom she trusts based on the reputation the conference has built over the years. Her co-authors have lauded the workshop. Mershon also uses the roster of past participants when deciding to where to present. A researcher of Mershon’s reputation can be choosy where she expends her service and outreach; “It’s the people who make a conference,” she says.
 
Two UVA Ph.D. graduate students will also present. Encouraged by Mershon, Geoff Gordon and Jenifer Simons submitted topics. The conference is selective about who attends.  
 
"Geoff Gordon and Jennifer Simons submitted strong applications," conference organizer Katri Seiberg writes. “Each of them had a research theme that corresponded nicely with the general theme—from Gordon’s work on inequality and elites, which fit with a sub theme on inequality, to Simon’s work on the radical right, which has a nice overlap with several other papers."
 
Geoff Gordon, 4th year grad student is a Jefferson Scholar and concentrates on the fascinating topic of democratic backsliding in new democracies. Lately he has been looking at oligarchs in Chile, Thailand, and Turkey, all featured largely in the news; the presidents of each country have been maneuvering power positions, buying up media, rewriting laws to secure and cement their power, and generally bending democratic methods to support their needs. Gordon will present on Inequality, Elite Bias, and Democratic Breakdown at the panel on inequality, 2016. The presentation is based on his dissertation work.
 
Jennifer Simons presents Radical-Right Backlash in Europe: Church-State Relations, Individual Religiosity, and Party Success, on the relationship between church-state relations, tolerance, and the success of the Radical Right in Europe. She argues that states that have pursued strict policies of secularism in public life have paradoxically fueled intolerance in their broader population. This intolerance is what fuels the support for Radical Right-wing parties.
 
The conference organizer, Katri Sieberg, has known Mershon for years through her research and notes "This year’s theme had a nice overlap with her work, so I invited her to participate.” Sieberg also co-authors with Charles Holt, University of Virginia Economics, and she occasionally visits UVA to run experiments. Also presenting, UVA Alum A.J. Bostian (UVA Economics, Ph.D. 2008) previously a lecturer at UVA and now a Fulbright Professor in the North American Studies program at the University of Tampere, has taught a number of classes in the Master’s Degree Program in Public Choice. He will teach future courses in the program and serves as a mentor for many of the students. The complete workshop program can be found here.
 
Sieberg says "We have no official relationship between our schools, but we welcome cooperation and would be interested in developing more cooperation.” Mershon notes that Sieberg builds a creative environment for conversation and relationships, an evening boat ride in Tampere’s Pyhäjärvi lake and potential saunas (!). Past participants have co-authored successful papers as a result of the conference, so it’s best not to question Sieberg’s methods.
 
Directly after Finland Mershon will head far, far south (9,017 miles/14,512 km) to the University of Venda, South Africa, to present Advancing Women’s Research in Higher Education at an invited lecture at the School of Human and Social Sciences. 
 
Tampere is in southern Finland, close to the water. Geoff Gordon has indicated there may be an exploration across the Gulf of Finland to Estonia. Simons will also go to Estonia and add Latvia, and St. Petersburg, Russia as well.

French’s Mustard, Est de la France, Oui ou Non?

Sonal PandyaSonal Pandya receives Stanford’s Hoover Fellowship to Continue Research on Supermarket Scanner Data

Professor Sonal Pandya has been selected as a W. Glenn Campbell and Rita Ricardo-Campbell National Fellow for 2016–17. Her research topic is beautifully quirky, the sort of thing which is interesting to every person who has ever bought a loaf of bread, a gallon of milk, a jar of mustard.

Sonal’s research uses supermarket scanner data to reveal Americans’ reactions to shock events – events which expose our nationalism and how we express patriotism through shopping. During 2003 France was opposed to  the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Scanner data reveals we changed our buying habits after this — reducing our purchases of TRESemmé shampoo, Raison d’être Beer, and yes, even French’s Mustard.

Non-French-speaking Americans picked up on written cues like accents, circumflexes, “eau’s” and “oui’s”, and bundled them all into a boycott against France. The reaction to the event was repeatedly stoked by Bill O’Reilly who included Roquefort dressing, Louis Vuitton, Yves Saint-Laurent, and Pierre Cardin in the boycott. In her paper French Roast: Consumer Response to International Conflict—Evidence from Supermarket Scanner Data, Sonal charted Fox News’ coverage against CNN’s which revealed huge differences between the peaks and valleys in how the two media outlets handled France’s announcement. The data revealed shoppers punished any brand which sounded French or even French-ish.

Fantastique! But also puzzling and a little sad for Americans. Her results do not reveal irony—in a world of multinationals, acculturation, branding, and identity-switching, who can say what products are Franco? or American? or Franco-American!?

The research was published in the journal Review of Economics and Statistics, and subsequently picked up by New York Magazine. This research opens a bunch of potential tools, for brand managers dealing with product identity and crisis communications, as a type of responsive polling data to be watched by policy makers, and perhaps by keen-eyed spies who want to know the political leanings of shoppers within driving distance of a Giant, Kroger, and Trader Joe’s.

Teasing Out

The Hoover Institute liked Sonal’s next project, International Conflict and Economic Interdependence Revisited, and invited her for a year-long fellowship, from September 2016 through June 2017. And so she returns to Stanford where she did her undergraduate work. The Hoover Institute Fellowship is an award earmarked for scholars at Sonal’s career level: someone within seven years of receiving their terminal degree, and post tenure—the time when faculty take on more daring research projects.

Sonal says this revisit will look at 9/11 and the efforts implemented by Homeland Security. What happens to a shopper when the Homeland Security alert system goes from green to red? What about when bin Ladin was captured? How much do fear and anxiety direct people towards American brands?

Teasing out is a phrase political scientists often use when looking at complex data. Sonal will be teasing out more knowledge from more supermarket data. She says the supply chain makes this complex—at what point can we infer causality? How do we parse the signal from the noise? Perhaps this knowledge can be used identify war casualties and events more important than mustard choice.

Sonal looks forward to conducting her research under the Hoover Fellowship. She says “the Hoover Institute can influence policy, and then get that policy information into the right hands.” It is a powerful opportunity. Previous Hoover Fellows you may recognize: former United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (Senior Fellow), UVA Department of Politics’ James Ceaser (Senior Fellow), George Schultz (Distinguished Fellow), Henry Kissinger (Distinguished Visiting Fellow), former Attorney General Ed Meese, former United States Senator Sam Nunn, former California governor Pete Wilson. Recipients also include three Nobel Prize winners, three Presidential Medal of Freedom winners, a National Medal of Science winner, a National Humanities Medal winner, three MacArthur Fellows, among many other types of awards. Sonal Pandya will be in prestigious company.

The Institute has a great array of seminars and events for National fellows. They also are expected to produce a publishable journal article or book manuscript while in residence. Fellows are also expected to participate in the intellectual life of the Hoover Institution, including attending seminars, roundtables with visiting policymakers and scholars, and social events. Political science nirvana.

More on Sonal Pandya’s and research partner Rajkumar Venkatesan supermarket scanner research here.

More on W. Glenn Campbell and Rita Ricardo-Campbell National Fellows.

Her website.

 

Lynn Sanders speaks at Jacob Lawrence Struggle Series Symposium

Lynn SandersLynn Sanders will be on a panel examining the works of Jacob Lawrence, an African American artist from Harlem, primarily known for his work which he termed dynamic cubism. Lynn, a painter as well as political scientist, uses art in her classes as a part of understanding politics. She reads a painting through subject, metaphor, symbol, color, and context—standard tools in art history, but a quite different lens for studying social science. The McIntire Department of Art and the Fralin Museum are co-sponsors in the event. See details of their schedule below.

Schedule

All events will take place the Harrison Institute/Small Special Collections Auditorium, unless otherwise noted

 

Thursday, April 14, 2016

 

6:00 pm: Reception (The Fralin Museum of Art)

6:15 pm: Welcome
6:30 pm: Poetry performance by University of Virginia students

 

Friday, April 15, 2016

 

8:15 am:  Coffee + Conversation

 

9:00 am: Session I

 

Welcome: Elizabeth Hutton Turner, University Professor, Modern Art, University of Virginia; Introduction: Andrea Douglas, Executive Director, Charlottesville’s Jefferson School African American Heritage Center

 

Personalizing Jacob Lawrence’s Self Portrait within Struggle

David Driskell, The David C. Driskell Center for Study of Visual Arts and Culture of African Americans and the African Diaspora

 

The talk will center on Lawrence’s personal portrayal of the African American experience as reflected in his painting entitled The Struggle.

 

10:00 am:  BREAK

 

10:15 am: Session II

 

Introduction: Deborah McDowell, Alice Griffin Professor, Department of English and Director of the Carter G. Woodson Center, University of Virginia

 

I Hope I Transcend the Strictly Parochial: Painting Resistance as a Universal Trope 

 

Sandy Alexandre, Associate Professor, Literature, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

 

This talk will constitute an effort to answer the following question: What does it look like to attempt to justify the breaking point of oppressed black people to those who fear it or who cannot even fathom its possibility? Ultimately, I hope to demonstrate how Lawrence’s paintings in the series concatenate to suggest that violence is not only the province of us all, but that it is also necessarily our inheritance as an American people.

 

Leslie King-Hammond, Graduate Dean Emeritus and Founding Director of the Center for            Race and Culture, Maryland Institute College of Art

 

11:45 am:  Q & A – Lisa Woolfork, Associate Professor, Department of English, University of Virginia

 

12:15 pm: LUNCH BREAK

 

2:00 pm: Session III

 

Introduction: Christa Noel Robbins, Assistant Professor, Department of Art, University of Virginia

 

Shilpa S. Davé, Assistant Professor, Department of Media Studies, University of Virginia

 

Theresa M. Davis, Associate Professor of Cross Cultural Performance, Department of Drama, University of Virginia

 

Carmenita Higginbotham, Associate Professor, American Art and Culture, Department of Art and American Studies Program, University of Virginia

 

M. Jordan Love, Academic Curator, The Fralin Museum of Art, University of Virginia

 

Lynn M. Sanders, Associate Professor, Department of Politics, University of Virginia

 

2:45 pm: BREAK

 

3:00 pm: Session IV

 

Introduction: Carmenita Higginbotham, Associate Professor, American Art and Culture, Department of Art and American Studies Program, University of Virginia

 

History as Symbols of Struggle:  Jacob Lawrence Chronicles a Revisionist History of        America

 

Patricia Hills, Professor Emerita, American Art and African American Art, Boston             University

 

In 1954 Lawrence applied to the Guggenheim Foundation for funds to complete an         ambitious eighty-panel history of the United States from 1607 to 1918. Although he         completed only thirty panels, he succeeded in presenting a revisionist, "bottom-up" version of history in which heroic actions are performed and sustained by ordinary   people.

 

4:15 pm:  Q & A – Elizabeth Hutton Turner, University Professor, Modern Art, University of Virginia

 

*We encourage visitors to also view the Jacob Lawrence exhibitions at The Fralin Museum of Art and the Special Collections Library.

 

This exhibition and symposium is supported by the Page-Barbour Fund, The McIntire Department of Art, Mr. Harvey Ross, The Jacob Lawrence Foundation, the Carter G. Woodson Institute for African American and African Studies at UVa, the Office of the Provost and Vice Provost for the Arts, the Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities (IATH), the Mary and David Harrison Institute for American History, Literature, and Culture, the Corcoran Department of History, and the Arts Council.

 

Two exhibitions featuring Jacob Lawrence and his work are displayed at the Fralin Museum and Small Special Collections Library.

His Open Door Policy Opens Doors

David Leblang Receives Mentoring Awards

David Leblang keeps his door open—and all kinds of opportunities wander in. For him the most pleasant are the ones where he ends up as a mentor. He has developed a reputation as a professor who freely shares advice, opens his network to others, and collaborates just because it's fun.

 

The rest of the world agrees, David just received the Society for Women in International Political Economy (SWIPE) 2016 Mentor Award at ISA's 57th Convention in Atlanta, Georgia.

 

David received the award as a result of letter nominations by individual supporters. Nominations noted his efforts in advancing the careers of women in political science, providing feedback and reviews on the work of junior scholars, and essential direction through the knot of academia. He also mentors outside the walls of his home institution, a gesture he learned from his own mentor, John Freeman. Leblang's graciousness,  gentle sense of humor, and vigilance in providing  a just educational environment are all factors in his success as a mentor.

 

Despite David's incredulity at winning the award, the SWIPE committee's rationale for for choosing him is made clear by the comments from the nominators: he counters the social networks that impede the career development of women, he establishes long-term mentoring relationships, and supports women with whom he has no institutional ties. He states that his behavior has "everything to do with mentoring, but nothing to do with gender," —but acknowledges the explicit bias in political science in academia, the different norms and expectations for female faculty and graduate students. And further that prejudices also exist in race, gender, and pedigree.

“...David consciously and systematically counters the gendered nature of academic social networks that undermine women’s career advancement.

As part of the ceremony,  a roundtable was held in his honor. Participants included two of his mentors, Steve Chan (University of Colorado) and John Freeman, (University of Minnesota).

 

Preparation—a key skill learned from Dr. Chan. He observed Chan walking the halls and meeting with people, hearing their concerns, developing solutions, and providing a vision. David recounts "Steve never called a department meeting where he did not know the outcome beforehand," a great lesson in leadership. Chan also shared the importance of family and work-life balance, institutional support and protection for faculty,  the value of giving and sharing time to collegues.

 

Early in David's career Dr. Freeman provided with strong scholarly mentoring as well. As a grad student at Vanderbilt working on a paper about capital controls in developing countries, David requested a working paper from Dr. Freeman with which he fundamentally disagreed. He wished to quote the working paper. Freeman agreed and requested David's paper in return. "Sometime later I received this—seven pages of single spaced, numbered criticisms of my paper. John took issue with analytics and the empirics, with the theory and the presentation of results. He methodically, carefully, pulled the paper apart bit by bit. You can imagine the horror, the embarrassment I felt as I read his comments as I was in the first year of a tenure track job."

 

In a PS at the end of the paper he requested that David send him clean copy of the paper. He wanted to use the paper in his graduate class. As David recounted this postscript at the SWIPE award, he called them the most powerful twenty-eight words he had ever read.

 

"And they remain the most powerful. Here was someone I'd never met. Who did not know me. Did not know my advisors, had never been to Vanderbilt or North Texas. He had zero connection to me. Yet he invested the time to read my work, to provide criticism but then to signal in the clearest way possible that he found value in my work."

A History of this Behavior

As evidence of his commitment to mentoring and leading by example, David also won the Outstanding Mentoring Award from the University of Virginia Provost's office in 2015. In contrast to his surprise at winning the SWIPE award, David facetiously indicates 'damn right,' he is deserving of this award, that within the walls of the University he works his butt off to help his colleagues and students.

 

The Provost's office award receives input from colleagues, mentees, and students.

 

What his nominator says: “A critical aspect of faculty mentorship is leading by example. And this is perhaps where David’s record is most remarkable. He has been a tireless leader of our department and an astoundingly prolific researcher (both at the same time).”

 

What his colleague says: “His mentorship was not confined to formal annual meetings, but took place every day, as he left his door open and invited junior colleagues to stop by or knocked on their doors to discuss various issues.”

 

What his mentee and colleague says: “He always acts as if he has all the time in the world to listen to your problems and help you solve them. He remembers details. He reminds you, by example, of why being a professor is fun. He is straightforward about what he thinks. … he is extremely creative and resourceful in finding answers to problems.”

 

It's key to remember that this effort doesn't come for free. David has integrated this process into his work, both as a chair and a scholar; his modesty aside, it is additional work—it requires holding these tactics in mind, remembering to act upon them, and not view mentoring as a burden. He says he wouldn't do it if there wasn't something in it for him, and apparently there is.

 

Leblang is Professor and Chair of the Woodrow Wilson Department of Politics and Faculty, Associate  and J. Wilson Newman Professor of Governance at the Miller Center.

 

Visit David's site page for more information, publications, and data.

 

David Leblang receives 2016 SWIPE Award

Len Schoppa Talks the Walk

Len Schoppa and Skye FitzgeraldLeonard Schoppa and Skye Fitzgerald screened their new documentary, “The Slow Walk Home” for an enthusiastic crowd of city planners, firefighters, pedestrians, bicyclists, parents, and activists. What kind of film can draw such a diverse audience? One about how children get to school in the United States compared to how they do it in Japan. The differences are profound.
 
98% of Japanese elementary school students walk 30 minutes or more to get to school. They travel in small packs shepherded by an older child, guided by (principally) female adults acting as crossing guards, on routes which have been mapped out for safety and easy navigation.
 
What makes this research dramatic and cinematic is the contrast with the commute of American kids: in 2009 data, only 13% were walking or biking to school.
 
In the film Schoppa and Fitzgerald point out other facts which make the lives of U.S. school students seem a little diminished: car commuters average 10 forty hour weeks in their vehicles annually; many feeder roads from suburbs into highways bisect neighborhoods preventing walking or biking; in this kind of asphalt environment, parents turn into a taxi service; and school grounds are forced to accommodate huge numbers of vehicles, buying tracts of expensive land (up to 40 acres) – otherwise they have to move further out where land is cheaper, but increasing commute times.
 
But not all is lost! The film attracted planners from the city of Charlottesville and the University, and bike and pedestrian activists, all intent on improving the slow walk commute locally. Insights gleaned from Japanese parents, school teachers, and a school principal include a process for involving the community, understanding the tradeoffs in creating a safe society, recognizing that that kidnappers and killers are rare, their behavior deviant (unlike what we see on America's Most Wanted), and the importance of involving law enforcement as a part of the whole plan.
 
Schoppa is Associate Dean for the Social Sciences and Professor of Politics at the University. He specializes in the politics and foreign relations of Japan.
 
See the trailer for the film here: http://spinfilm.wix.com/slowwayhome
 
 Preliminary screenings have been scheduled for:
  
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
February 23rd, 2016
 
University of Virginia in Charlottesville
Wednesday, March 16, 5 pm
Nau Hall 101
 
 Mercy College in New York
Tuesday, March 15
 
 Many PBS Stations will broadcast the film on Bike and Walk to School Day (May 4, 2016).
Check your local listings.
 
 Additional screenings can be found here: